You can grab the original full-resolution images directly from the publisher's website:


TODAY's photo

Posted 25 June 2014 - 08:01:55
Not a question: look at the "alternative", was shot by me at the Similan National Park, Thailand.Would be nice to be on the first spot
Posted 26 June 2014 - 08:11:54
They use wide range of different cameras.I wonder what kind of price range do the cameras belong that they use shooting these recent Webshots pictures.
Posted 26 June 2014 - 20:37:54
50% camera 50% the photographers skill.
It's no question that a good photo begins at the photographer but the image quality is another important aspect. These photos are nice, but you can tell that these were made by an aging camera.
This is the reason why I start to wonder all the time when I want to shot a beautiful nature shot with my S4 that Does it worth it? I won't appreciate the pic enough anyway beacuse of the quality flaws. Expect a very few cases when light circumstances are just optimal to shoot with a cell.
Posted 26 June 2014 - 20:40:46
Check out this: http://camerashowdown.com/
Unfortunately not the same compositions are compared but you can still get the point.
Posted 26 June 2014 - 22:02:29
5%/95% I might tell ya'.50% camera 50% the photographers skill.
Those photos were made on 2004 - check the EXIF.but you can tell that these were made by an aging camera.
Okay - then check THIS out! This full-res one is directly from the camera - no any Photoshop (yet!) involved.This is the reason why I start to wonder all the time when I want to shot a beautiful nature shot with my S4 that Does it worth it? I won't appreciate the pic enough anyway beacuse of the quality flaws. Expect a very few cases when light circumstances are just optimal to shoot with a cell.